Skip to content

good practice and innovation
about us infoKits Tools & Techniques Publications Events
You are here: Home » infoKits » Effective Use of VLEs » e-assessment » Assessment Resources and Links

Resources and Links

Resource Links

Some Question Banks [all accessed 22nd March 2004]

References

Angus S., McDonald (2002), The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computer-based and paper-and-pencil educational assessments, Computer & Education, 39, 299-312.

Ashcroft, K. and Palacio, D. (1996) Researching into Assessment and Evaluation. London: Kogan Page.

Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education. 5 (1), 7-71.

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. and Wiliam, D. (2003) Working inside the black box. Kings College London, Department of Education and Professional Studies. ISBN 1871984394 [available from
http://www.nfer-nelson.co.uk/catalogue/catalogue_detail.asp?catid=101&id=1229 for a small charge]

Bloom, B.S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. and Krathwohl, D. R., (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay.

Boud, D. (1995a). Assessment and learning: contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.) Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page, 35-48.

Bradford M., A view from the top. Exchange, 4, Spring 2003: 8.

Brosnan, M. (1999). Computer anxiety in students: Should computer-based assessment be used at all? In Brown, S., Race, P. & Bull, J. (1999) (Eds), Computer-assisted assessment in higher education. London: Kogan-Page.

Brown, G., Bull, J. and Pendlebury, M. (1997) Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge.

Brown S and Knight P 'Assessing Learning in Higher Education' Kogan Page 1994.

Bull, J. and McKenna, C. (2004) Blueprint for Computer-assisted Assessment. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Bull, J., and Dalziel, J. (2003), Testing Question Banks, Chapter 14, pp171-181, Reusing Online Resources: A Sustainable Approach to eLearning, Kogan Page, London, ISBN 0780749-439507

Clarke, Sophie. Lindsay, Katharine. McKenna, Chris. New, Steve - INQUIRE: a case study in evaluating the potential of online MCQ tests in a discursive subject - Volume 12, Number 3/September 2004 of ALT-J.

Carroll, J. (2002) A Handbook for Deterring Plagiarism in Higher Education. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development

Cowan, J., (2003) Assessment for Learning, giving timely and effective feedback. Exchange, Issue 4, 21-22.

Christie, James. Automated essay marking - for both style and content. In Myles Danson and Robert Sherratt, editors, Proceedings of the 3rd Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, pages 39-50. The Flexible Learning Initiative, Loughborough University, 1999. ISBN 0-9533210-3-7.

Christie, James. Computer assisted assessment of essays. In Proceedings of the 2nd Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, pages 85-89. The Flexible Learning Initiative, Loughborough University, 1998. ISBN 0-9533210-1-0.

Clariana, R. B. & Wallace, P.E. (2002). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Key factors associated with the test mode effect. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33 (5), 595-904.

Clarke, Sophie. Lindsay, Katharine. McKenna, Chris. New, Steve - INQUIRE: a case study in evaluating the potential of online MCQ tests in a discursive subject - Volume 12, Number 3/September 2004 of ALT-J

Davies, P. (2004) Don't write just mark: the validity of assessing student ability via their computerized peer-marking of an essay rather than their creation of an essay. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology. 12 (3) 261-277.

Gipps, C. (2003) Should universities adopt ICT-based assessment Exchange Spring 2003. 26-27.

Haladyna, T. M (1997) Writing Test Items to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking, Allyn and Bacon, Massachusetts.

Hay, Iain and Bull, Joanne. Passing Online Exams. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Volume 26, Number 2, 1 July 2002, 239 - 244.

James, R., McInnis, C. and Devlin, M. (2002) Assessing Learning in Australian Universities. Canberra: Australian Universities Teaching Committee.
http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglearning

Johnstone, A. (2003). Effective Practice in Objective Assessment. LTSN Physical Sciences Centre

Littlejohn, A. H., (2003) Reusing Online Resources: A Sustainable Approach to eLearning, Kogan Page, London, ISBN 0780749-439507

Macdonald & Twining (2002) 'Assessing activity based learning for a networked course', British Journal of Educational Technology 33 (5) 605-620

Mackenzie, D. (2003) Assessment for E-Learning: What are the Features of an Ideal E-Assessment System? CAA Conference Proceedings 2003. 185-194. Available from the conference archive section of the CAA Conference website.

McAlpine, M. (2004) Easing the transition from paper to screen: an evaluatory framework for CAA migration. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology. 12 (3) 231-248.

McKenna, C. and Bull, J., (2000) Quality assurance of computer-assisted assessment: practical and strategic issues. Quality Assurance in Higher Education. 8 (1) 24-31.

Nichol, D.J. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2004). Rethinking formative assessment in HE: a theoretical model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Higher Education Academy. Available from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assessment/ASS051D_SENLEF_model.doc

Nichol, D.J. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2005). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Accepted for publication by Studies in Higher Education (2005).

Nichol, D.J. & Milligan, C. (in press). Rethinkng technology-supported assessment in terms of the seven principles of good feedback practice. In K.Clegg and C. Bryan (eds), Innovating in Assessment, RoutledgeFarmer.

Noyes, J. M., Garland, K. J. & Robbins, E. (2004). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment - is workload another test mode effect? British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 111-113.

O'Hare, D. & Mackenzie, D. M. 2004 Advances in Computer Aided Assessment. Staff and Educational Development Association Ltd, Birmingham, UK.

Ramsden, P., (1992) Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Routledge

Ricketts, C., and Wilks, S. J. (2002) Improving student performance through computer-based assessment: insights from recent research. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 27 (5) 475-479.

Ridgway, J. and McCuster, S. (2003) Using computers to assess new educational goals. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 10(3), 309-328.

Rovai, A. P. (2000) 'Online and traditional assessments: What is the difference?' The Internet and Higher Education 3, 3, 141-151

Rowntree, D. (1987) Assessing Students - how shall we know them? London, Harper and Row

Sadler, D. R. (1998) Formative assessment: revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education. 5 (1), 77-84.

Sadler, D. R. (1989) Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science. 18 119-144.

Sclater, N. and Cross, R. (2003) What is Question and Test interoperability? CETIS Briefing Paper

Sclater, N. and MacDonald, M. (2004) Putting interoperability to the test: building a large reusable assessment item bank. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology. 12 (3) 205-213.

Sim, G., Holifield, P. and Brown, M. (2004) Implementation of computer assisted assessment: lessons from the literature. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology. 12 (3) 216-229.

SQA (2003) Guidelines on online assessment for further education. Available online at: http://www.sqa.org.uk

Thomas, R. C. and Milligan, C. (2003). Online Assessment of Practical Experiments. Proceedings of 7th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, Loughborough.

Weavers, C. (2003) What do students want from assessment? Exchange, Issue 4 Spring 2003:12-13 http://www.exchange.ac.uk/files/eissue4.pdf

Weller, Martin - Assessment Issues on a Web-based Course - Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Mar 2002, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p109, 8p

Zakrzewski, S. and Steven, C. (2003) Computer-based assessment: quality assurance issues, the hub of the wheel. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 28 (6) 609-623.


Bookmark and Share
If you can read this text, it means you are not experiencing the Plone design at its best. Plone makes heavy use of CSS, which means it is accessible to any internet browser, but the design needs a standards-compliant browser to look like we intended it. Just so you know ;)